subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

New: CounterPunch's Top 100 Nonfiction Books in Translation

 

Five Days That
Shook The World:
The Battle for Seattle
and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
with Photos
by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

INSIDE

Subscribe Now Online!

EXCLUSIVE TO
COUNTERPUNCH
SUBSCRIBERS

Published on February 18

BEAST IN GOLD BRAID:
GENERAL PINOCHET

The General Turns
Out to Be a Coward.
When Police Knock
at His Door and Threatended to Slap Cuffs on him, Pinochet Fainted

EMINEM:

A Hired Gun from the
Poor Part of Town, Who Preys on the
Powerless, Extorts
Money from the Poor
and Celebrates a
Thuggish Brand of
Gangster Capitalism

 

BOVE OF MILLAU:

If There's One Organizer Symbolizing the Worldwide Counterattack on Corporate Agriculture It's Jose Bove

 

Published on January 30

THE TERRORIST'S RETURN:
THE CRIMES OF SHARON

From Qibya to
Beirut:
Ariel Sharon's
Bloody Record

FAKING IT

Democrats Roll
Over on Ashcroft

COUNTERPUNCH SERIES
ON BUSH/CHENEY
CABINET CONTINUES

They All Love
Anne Veneman

OUR LITTLE SECRETS

Gore Gets More
Votes, Doesn't Care

What William Carlos
Williams Really
Thought About
The Beats



Search CounterPunch

Al Gore:
A User's Manual
by Cockburn
and St. Clair

Buy This Explosive
New Book at an
Amazing Discount!
 

Reviews of Gore:
a User's Manual

 

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press
by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair

A Pocket Guide to
Environmental Bad Guys
by James Ridgeway
and Jeffrey St. Clair


Private Warriors
by Ken Silverstein


CounterPunch's Booktalk

New Stories:

Bush Draws First Blood

Hate Crimes and Death Penalty

Guiliani's Latest Art Fit

The Politics of Eminem

The Great Alaska Oil Rush

Clinton Goes to Harlem

The Crimes of Ariel Sharon

Depleted Uranium:
Cancer as Weapon

TR, Clinton, Powell and Plan Colombia

Ashcroft an Extremist?

Farewell Bill and HIll

Criminalizing Youth

CounterPunch Coverage
of Election 2000

The New Reality:
Enviros, Fears and Cash

What Seattle Wrought

The Passing of the
Archdruid

"City on Fire!"
Daily CounterPunch
Reports from Prague

No Fault Journalism:
The NYT Slimes
Wen Ho Lee

Pentagon Auctions
Off the White House

And You Call This a
War Crime Tribunal?

Colombia, HRW and
McCaffery

UN Turns Blind Eye
to NATO War Crimes

Jackboot State

Dog Revolt!

South Carolina's Flag

Attack on Micro-Radio

Beyond Left and Right

CNN and Psyops

Cops and Dogs

Eugenics:
the Impulse Never Dies

The IRA's Bum Rap

Crazed Cops
or Fallen Heroes?

How the Pentagon
Faked the Star
Wars Tests

It's a Gas, Gas, Gas:
Jeffrey St. Clair's
Seattle Diary

The CounterPunch 100:
Our List of the
Century's Most Important
Non-fiction Books

Talk Back to
CounterPunch on
Our New Feedback Page!

Al Gore's Top Man: How Tony Coelho Rips Off the Grieving

Food Central: How 3 Firms
Have Come to Control
the World's Food Supply

CIA Shrinks
and LSD

Cruel and Unusual Punishment:
Lee Davis Execution Photos

Children In Banana Trees:
a photo exhibit by David Bacon

Guns, the Left and the Constitution

Waco and the Press

Bill Gates' Mugshot

The Hillary Syndrome

Colombia:
Is It the Next Guatemala?

George W. Bush's Money Men: The 119 Pioneers

What Set Off Ted K.?: The Unabomber, the CIA & LSD

February 27, 2001

Blair's Deadly Double Standard

New Labor, New Bombs

By Tariq Ali

As the future ripens in the past, so the past rots in the present. American leaders have long been used to treating the cracked British vase as a pisspot, but Attlee and Wilson, while dutifully kissing ass in the White House, did , at least, attempt to restrict and restrain the United States, albeit with little success. Blair and Cook and the rest of this dreadful gang seem to be only too delighted with any new opportunity to bark their support for the imperial war-monger in the White House, bombing Baghdad to show his toughness to electors at home and recalcitrants abroad. Blair's argument that the new bombing was necessary to protect the lives of British pilots is incredible.

What the hell are these pilots doing in Iraq in the first place? Why have they been bombing Iraq for the last ten years? Over the last two years alone, the USA and Britain have dropped over 400 tons of bombs and missiles on Iraq. Blair has been raining down deadly explosives at a rate twenty times greater than Major. No other country in Europe supports this fire-storm. The bombardment of Iraq has now lasted longer than the US invasion of Vietnam. Blair, Cook and the entire Government are so used to the stench of their own hypocrisy that they can justify anything. No doubt Lord Macdonald will soon be telling viewers that the bombing raids were necessary to defend the democratic rights of the military-industrial complex to maximise profits, without which nothing can work and, therefore, if we want a better system of privatized transport in Britain we must understand the bombs are necessary. The brazen opportunism of New Labour culture appears to be reflected in the Labour Party as a whole and has affected its capacity to think critically.

The orthodox casuistry among loyal columnists and courtiers is to justify inconvenient realities-Israeli possession of nuclear weapons and colonial brutalities inflicted on the Palestinians, Turkish oppression of the Kurds, the clerical dictatorship in Saudi Arabia, etc.-with a breathtaking cynicism. Thus Blair's Personal Assistant for Foreign Affairs, ex-diplomat Robert Cooper writes in his book of The Post-Modern State and the World Order" that: "We need to get used to the idea of double standards." He also informs us casually that "the reasons for fighting the Gulf War were not that Iraq had violate the norms of international behaviour", but the need for the West to keep a tight grip on "vital oil supplies."

Together with the bombing, the sanctions regime kept in place by Clinton and Blair ands now Bush and Blair, has cost the lives of, taking the lowest estimate, 300,000 children. As the jets take off again for yet another bombing raid on the shattered and famished remnants of a Third World Country, why is the Labour Party so silent. A country mobilized for war by shameless demagogy can in a more disillusioned mood become vulnerable to other and more consistent demagogues. Dissent that refuses to be a spectator, but insists on wedging itself into the forbidden zones of modern politics is vital as a physic for any functioning democracy.

Dissent in Britain has become atomized. It reflects a hostility to all traditional politics and is confined to single-issues related to the environmental and animal rights. Most of these deserve support and yet something was missing. I wonder whether those who were extremely upset a few years ago by the cramped living conditions in which calves were shipped to slaughter-houses in France ever spared a thought for the number of children who died in Iraq from malnutrition and lack of medicine as a direct result of the inhuman sanctions policy imposed by Washington and London. Time to wake-up. CP