home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

CounterPunch

February 15, 2003

Anybody Remember the Powell Doctrine?

Colin...Read Your White Paper

By RICH PROCTER

Anybody remember the 90's? Rember our "Long National Nightmare of Peace and Prosperity," when pundits loved to bash Bill Clinton's foreign policy by citing "the Powell Doctrine"? This was the Doctrine that was going to keep us from entangling ourselves in another Vietnam. Haven't heard much about the "Powell Doctrine" recently, especially from its author, Colin Powell. I believe Mr. Powell is too busy wielding his awesome "street cred" to prop up the Bushies "War Right This Very Second!!!" program.

Just for the heck of it, why don't we examine the Powell Doctrine, and see how it applies to the invasion...er, that is the "liberation" of Iraq. Powell said that six questions MUST be answered before US forces could be committed to combat abroad. Locked, loaded and cocked? Here we go...

1) Is A Vital US Interest At Stake? -- Is Saddam massing troops on his borders, threatening one of our allies? No. Has he developed weapons of mass destruction that he might use on Israel or Kuwait? Not that the UN has discovered. Is he acting belligerent toward our friends? Ahhhhhh...no. So the Powell Doctrine votes "NO" on number one.

2) Will We Commit Sufficient Resources To Win? Yes, I know the plan is to rain terror from the sky on Iraq with hundreds of smart bombs in a Dresden-like campaign of horror and demoralization. The hope is that Saddam will realize we mean business, and he'll give up, and Bush II will have a nice, short, low (US) casualty, telegenic war ending in high-fives all around and a swell coffee table book, available for a $500 donation to the RNC. But most (non-Bush) experts believe there's an excellent chance the war will get bogged down in block-by-block fighting in Baghdad, where smart bombs are useless and it's pretty much M-16 versus AK-47. This could lead to a long, nasty, bloody war -- and this is NOT the war Bush is selling the American people. The answer to this is a conditonal "Yes, but..." as in yes, but when Bush's popularity goes below 30%, look for a quick "declaration of victory" and let's get the hell out of there no matter what the circumstance.

3) Are Our Objectives Clearly Defined? Well, kinda sorta. We want to find and destroy their weapons...if they have any. We want to destroy Saddam...unless he agrees to go into exile. We want Iraq to become a new bastion of Democracy in the Middle East...but Islamic extremists might capture free elections, so that won't happen in our lifetime. We want to "safeguard" their oil fields (Bwaa Haa Haa!) The Defense Department clearly wants to kick Saddam's ass and scram. The State Department wants us to stick around a few decades to re-make the Middle East as a vassal state of the Republican Party. So the answer to #3 is no.

4) Will We Sustain the Commitment? See #2. Bush begins running for re-election next summer. Most likely, the economy will still be in the dumper. If the evening news is a montage of stacked body bags, gleeful al-Jazeera bin Laden tapes and "concerned Defense Officials" looking everywhere for the "light at the end of the tunnel," the answer is an emphatic NO.

5) Is There A Reasonable Expectation that the Public and Congress Will Support the Operation? Bush is clearly promising the American public "War Lite" -- a hailstorm of smart bombs, a lightning troop sweep, and a Victory Parade featuring the Grateful Iraqui Public welcoming their Liberators. If the war lasts longer than a month and we seem to be bogging down, expect public support to plummet. And since every Congressman and 1/3 of our Senators are running for re-election next year, expect them to run for cover. An resounding NO on this one.

6) Have we exhausted our other options? The only folks who believe we've exhausted our options are the Bushies. The UN doesn't believe it. The Pope doesn't believe it. Our NATO allies don't believe it. Most of the public doesn't believe it. Bush says he believes it, but he can't seem to muster the proof, beyond some fuzzy photographs and some ginned up "evidence" designed to keep the true believers in line. NO to this one.

So there you have it, sports fans. Five NOs and one "Yes, but..." Ouch! If Colin were taking this test at a State University, his grade would be "F -- See Me." Of course, Colin Powell will never be grilled on applying his own Doctrine, because the "liberal" press won't bring it up. And the man who created a Doctrine designed to insure that America would never suffer another Vietnam will go along with Bush to plunge America into a war based on an elaborate web of deliberate lies (like Vietnam), with squishy public support (like Vietnam), creating what could turn into a catastrophic debacle with huge loss of life (like Vietnam).

Mr. Powell seems to have misplaced his own Doctrine. Would somebody please give him a copy before it's too late?

Rich Procter can be reached at planetniner@yahoo.com

Yesterday's Features

CounterPunch News Service
Slow Lerner: It May Not Help Kids in Iraq, But It Sure Got Michael Lerner Airtime

Andrew Murray
Tony Blair Versus the British People

Ben Tripp
President A**hole

Peggy Thomson
My Close Encounter with Saddam

Gary Leupp
Meet Mr. Blowback:
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, CIA Op and Homicidal Thug

Saul Landau
Bush and Corporate Fraud

Adam Engel
A Civilian Occupation:
The Politics of Israeli Architecture

Anthony Gancarski
Jacksonville in Crisis

Rick Giombetti
Specific Threats to Democracy

Jean-David Levitte
A Warning on Iraq from France:
Make War the Last Option

Ian Gurney
Whose Side is Bush On?

Maria Engqvist
Did the FARC Shoot Down a US Military Plane in Colombia?

Ron Jacobs
This Madness Must Cease

Josh Frank
Call to Washington:
Stonewall Bush

Website of the Day
Rock Out Against War


Keep CounterPunch Alive:

Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /

 

CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers:

  • CounterPunch Special: The Persecution of Gershon Legman by Susan Davis: Smut, the Post Office, Commies and the FBI;
  • Reeling Democrats: Is Pelosi the Answer?
  • Gandhi v. Hitler: the Secret Race for the Nobel Prize;
  • Sullying Mario Savio's Memory;
  • Lynching Then and Now;
  • Earn While You Learn: Chris Whittle and Child Labor;

    The Case of the Pompous Professor;
  • The Class Struggle in Boston: All that Effort, But What Did They Get?

Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring , with about seven million hits a month now. This is inspiring, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1 800 840 3683

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /

February 8 / 9, 2003

Bill Christison
The US Gameplan for Iraq

Intelligence Officers for Sanity
Memo to Bush on Iraq

Olive Lowell
Homeland Insecurity
Champaign-Urbana Shaken by New INS Rules

Michael Neumann
Nonviolence: Its Histories and Myths

Alison Weir
A Thousand Professors

David Krieger
On the Brink of War

Muqtedar Khan
The Logic of the Hawks

Anthony Gancarski
Pakistan on the Brink?

Jason Leopold
GAO Surrenders to Cheney

Anis Shivani
A Post-Liberal Theory of Consciousness for the Starbucks Habitué

David Vest
Dive Bomber

Norman Madarasz
The New Brazilian Cinema

Poets' Basement
Handleman, Smith, Engel

Website of the Weekend
Cities for Peace

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair