home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

Read Cockburn and St. Clair's Whiteout: the CIA, Drugs and the Press and discover how the CIA gave a helping hand to the opium lords who took over Afghanistan, thus ushering the Taliban into power.


CounterPunch: Complete Coverage of 9/11 and the War on Afghanistan

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Published November 28: Kevin Alexander Gray explores the crisis in America's black leadership; an FBI agent's torture confession; liberals see "silver lining" in war; married to a muslim truck driver. Note: CounterPunch has fallen victim to the @home bankruptcy, leaving us without internet access since Friday. Things may not be entirely back to speed for another week. For those of you trying to reach Jeffrey St. Clair, his new email address is: sitka@attbi.com. Subscribe Now!

December 7, 2001

Alexander Cockburn
Sharon or Arafat:
Who's the Terrorist?

December 6, 2001

CounterPunch Wire
Hampshire College the First
to Condemn the War

Robert Jensen
University Teaching After
September 11

Jack McCarthy
Does Tom Friedman Read
the New York Times?

Sam and Leila Bahour
The Psychology of a Suicide Attacker

December 5, 2001

Edward Hammond
The Only Real Way to
Prevent Biowarfare

Harvey Wasserman
Atomic Treason in the House

Carl Estabrook
America's Israel

Don Williams
Questions Barbara Walters Didn't Ask George Bush

Cockburn/St. Clair
Liberals Hail War as
Return of Big Government

Robert Fisk
The Last Colonial War?

Bahour/Dahan
It's About the Occupation

December 4, 2001

Dave Marsh
A Plea for Byron Parker

Rep. Ron Paul
Keep Your Eye on the Target

Susan Herman
Ashcroft and the Patriot Act

Tariq Ali
The Afghan King and the Nazis

November 30, 2001

Jordan Green
Disappeared in the Southland

Willliam Blum
Rebuilding Afghanistan?

November 29, 2001

Phillip Cryan
Defining Terrorism

Robert Fisk
We Are the War Criminals Now

November 28, 2001

Tom Turnipseed
A Continuum of Terror

Patrick Cockburn
Tribal Council:
Don't Blame It All on Taliban

Robert Fisk
At Last, The Truth about the Sabra and Chatila Massacres

Harry Browne
The Bill of Rights:
They Threw It All Away

Sunil Sharma
Suffer Palestine's Children

November 27, 2001

Paul Coggins
Kafka and the Patriot Act

Tariq Ali
Tigris and Euprhates

November 26, 2001

Robert Fisk
Blood and Tears in Kandahar

Jeffrey St. Clair
Boeing's Sweet Deal

CounterPunch Wire
Human Rights Abuses and
Nuke Waste Shipments

Alexander Cockburn
Harry Potter and Terrorism


A Photographic Journal of Life in an Afghan Refugee Camp
By Judith Mann

Resources:
100s of Links About 9/11


CounterPunch:
Complete Coverage of 9/11 and Its Aftermath


Five Days That
Shook The World:
Seattle and Beyond

By Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair
Photos by Allan Sekula

(Click Here to Order from CounterPunch Online at 20% Off Amazon.com's price!)

INSIDE

Subscribe Online!

EXCLUSIVE TO
COUNTERPUNCH
SUBSCRIBERS


Published Oct. 15, 2001

8-Page Special Issue

War Diary

CIA's Assassination Plan a History of Torture in US Prisons

bin Laden and Bush Business Connections

Aisha Ikramuddin on the Hidden Hype of US Food Bombs

Peter Linebaugh on Pakistan

Christopher Hitchens' Love for Mrs. Thatcher

Jiang Zemin Tells Bush:
Nuke 'Em


Search CounterPunch

Read Whiteout and Find Out How the CIA's Backing of the Mujahideen Created the World's Most Robust Heroin Market and Helped to Finance the Rise of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden

Whiteout:
CIA, Drugs & the Press

by Alexander Cockburn
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Memphis Blues Again:
Six Decades of Memphis Music Photographs
Photos by Ernest Withers
Text by Daniel Wolff

The New Intifada:
Resisting Israel's Apartheid

Edited by Roane Carey

A Pocket Guide to
Environmental Bad Guys
by James Ridgeway
and Jeffrey St. Clair

The Phoenix Program
by Douglas Valentine

Al Gore:
A User's Manual
by Cockburn
and St. Clair

Buy This Explosive
New Book at an
Amazing Discount!
 

Reviews of Gore:
a User's Manual


Private Warriors
by Ken Silverstein

CounterPunch's Booktalk

December 7, 2001

Occupation as Terrorism

By George Naggiar

Military occupation is terrorism. It targets not merely combatants, but civilian populations. Its maintenance is a willful act, not one that is committed by accident. It has, in the case of Israel's prolonged occupation, a decidedly political and wholly unjustifiable - both legally and morally - goal of allowing forced colonization (or, as it is euphemistically called, "settlement") on an essentially imprisoned people. It is, in Israel's situation, a system of institutionalized and premeditated violence that has intenationally targeted not merely some individual Palestinians, but an entire innocent civilian population of several million human beings.

In addition to the enormous devastation that it has brought to the living, because Israeli occupation's maintenance is deliberate, regardless of whether violent actions to maintain it have purposely targeted the innocent for death, the deaths of over hundreds of innocent Palestinians in the last 14 months alone can only be described as intentional, and occupation and those who have worked to preserve it bear direct responsibility for them. And so because Israel's military occupation of Palestine has intentionally inflicted fear and, in many cases, death on innocent Palestinian civilians for political purposes, that occupation can, with the highest accuracy, be termed a terrorist activity. And because it has existed for more than a third of a century and has, over countless objections of the world community, routinely violated basic standards of decency in human behavior as expressed in international humanitarian and human rights law, it is terrorism of the most hideous and uncivilized sort. Unfortunately, it is not so described by US government officials and media.

Instead, only violent Palestinian reactions to this system of terror are termed terrorist. Only when Palestinians reprehensively, indefensibly and, in the end, foolishly inflict horror on innocent Israelis has "terrorism" been said to occur. A Molotov cocktail thrown at an occupying Israeli soldier is an "instrument of terror". Even a Palestinian youth throwing a stone at a heavily armed, occupying Israeli soldier is described as committing an "act of terror". These acts are never depicted as misguided retaliations for 34 years of the terrorism of occupation and colonization, in which Palestinians' homes have systematically been destroyed, their land ruthlessly colonized, their property confiscated without due process, they have been taxed without representation, they have been deprived of rights to their land's water and natural resources, and they have been widely humiliated for no good reason; rather, they are mindless "violence" unexplainable but for "ancient hatreds" and "fanatical Islam".

And so when the Ariel Sharon-led Israeli government violently struggles to preserve its 34-year military occupation, it is not maintaining a system of terror, but, absurdly, is somehow "fighting it". It is, as Mr. Bush put it, only "defending itself". Or, even more ridiculously, according to the US media, IT is "retaliating". This despite the fact that retaliation implies some proportionality in response, which has clearly been lacking in almost all Israeli attacks (three times the number of Palestinians as Israelis have been killed in the last 14 months), and despite the fact that Israeli attacks are more accurately understood as the systematic destruction of the possibility of Palestinian statehood and civil society than they are "retaliation". Yet the fiction persists.

The reality, however, is that for the last 34 years, Israel's government has been engaged in a systematic campaign of institutionalized terrorism against a captive Palestinian civilian population. It has, in full contravention of international law and the will of entire international community (or, if you prefer, coalition), militarily occupied the Palestinian people's collective space and consciousness, destroyed their homes, trees and livelihoods, denied them all of the basic rights entitled to human beings, and kept them from resisting this state of affairs with enormous physical force (even employing Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in this latter effort), all to further invade their land with outsiders, which Mr. Sharon openly continues to insist upon. A generation of Palestinians has literally been born into the world as victims of this terror and they are now rebelling in kind. And only those who cannot quiet, rather than those who have created, their considerable (and easily comprehensible) rage are blamed.

If this is the reality, then what is the solution? For terrorism, all of it, must be discredited and brought to its ultimate demise. First, rather than continue with their counterproductive and divisive form of resistance, the Palestinian people should finally transform their rebellion against Israeli colonial occupation from one of violence to one of active nonviolence. The people of Israel should and will surely join them. And as for the United States: if US government officials and media are serious about wanting to combat worldwide terrorism, then perhaps before they condemn every single act of Palestinian resistance to military occupation as "terror", they should loudly denounce-and, in the case of our elected representatives, cease needlessly supplying taxpayer-purchased weapons for-the longstanding and yet still un-addressed terrorism of Israeli occupation, a terrorism that, if not defeated, will forever prevent peace and reconciliation for the weary and long-suffering people of Israel and Palestine alike.

George Naggiar is an Arab-American writer and the Chairman of the Middle East Law and Policy Society at the Georgetown University Law Center.