home / subscribe / donate / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events

 

New Edition of CounterPunch

The Return of Robert Rubin: Kerry, Jobs and the Economy by Alexander Cockburn; Party Favors: the Political Business of Terry McAuliffe by Jeffrey St. Clair; The Kill Zone: Caring for the Wounded in Fallujah by David Martinez. In April, CounterPunch Online was read by 16.1 million viewers--by far our biggest month ever. But remember, we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a (tax deductible) donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Cockburn / St. Clair's Scorching New History of a Decade of War
Now Available!

Today's Stories

May 5, 2004

Gilbert Achcar
Bush's Cakewalk into the Iraq Quaqmire

 

May 4, 2004

Human Rights Watch
A Timeline of Torture and Abuse Allegations and Responses

Kurt Nimmo
The CIA Privatized Torture

David Peterson
CBS, Self-Censorship & Iraq

Barry Lando
CACI's Private Torture Chambers

Patrick Cockburn
Torture: Iraqis Disgusted, But Not Surprised

Dr. Susan Block
Indecent Insurgents: Watch What You Say

Fidel Castro
A Mindless, Unnecessary War

Mike Whitney
Empire of Torture

Sonali Kolhatkar
How to Stop the War: Demonstrate Against John Kerry

Josh Frank
The Lost Sierra Club

Stan Goff
The Role: Another Open Letter to US Troops in Iraq

Agustin Velloso
Spare Us Your Disgusting Ethics

Stew Albert
American Know-How

Website of the Day
Scenes from a Cover-Up

May 3, 2004

Virginia Tilley
Let the Wall of Silence Fall

May 1 / 2, 2004

Patrick Cockburn
An Army in Disgrace, a Policy in Tatters, the Real Prospect of Defeat

Robert Fisk
"Good Guys" Who Can Do No Wrong

Alexander Cockburn
Watching Niagara: Stupid Leaders, Useless Spies, Angry World

Heather Williams
Gringo, We're Going Home: Latin American Troops Flee Iraq

Diane Rejman
An Army Vet on Torture in Iraq: Abu Ghraib as My Lai?

Diane Christian
Blood Spilling: Osama, Bush and Sharon Speak the Same Language

Patrick Cockburn
Seems Like Old Times in Fallujah

Dave Lindorff
Bush's Torturous Logic: Shocked, Shocked, Shocked

Chris Floyd
Suicide Bomber: Neocons, Nihilists and Annihilation

April 29 / 30, 2004

Dave Zirin
A Pawn in Their Game: the Unlonesome Death of Pat Tillman

Kathy Kelly
The Warden's Tour

Greg Weiher
Fallujah and the Warsaw Ghetto: the Banality of Evil

Michael S. Ladah
Terrorism and Assassination: the Ultimate Depception

Patrick Cockburn
The Fallujah Mutinies

 

April 28, 2004

Christopher Brauchli
Meet Congressman Know-Nothing: Tom Tancredo

Wendy Brinker
The Politics of the Numb

Faisal Kutty
The Dirty Work of Canadian Intelligence

John Chuckman
Seeking the Evil One

Mike Whitney
Flag-Draped Coffins and the Seattle Times

Tom Mountain
Rwanda and the F***** Word

Graeme Greenback
The Iraqi Alamo: a CNN/CIA Production

Tracy McLellan
The War Comes Home

M. Junaid Alam
We are the Barbarians

William Loren Katz
Iraq, the US and an Old Lesson


April 27, 2004

James Davis
The Colombia 3 Acquitted

Dave Lindorff
Chalabi as Prosecutor

Bruce Schneier
Terrorist Threats and Political Gain

Cockburn / Sengupta
British Generals Resist Calls for More Troops to Aid Americans in Iraq

Walt Brasch
Presidential Letters: The Day I Was Asked to Feed an Elephant

Saul Landau
The Empire in Denial and the Denial of Empire

 


April 26, 2004

Patrick Cockburn
Crossing the Shia Line: US Troops Prepare to Enter Najaf

Wayne Madsen
Trading Places: Will the US Go the Way of the USSR?

Grover Furr
Protest, Rebellion, Commitment

Elaine Cassel
Lies About the Patriot Act

Mickey Z.
Inspired by Pat Tillman?

Greg Moses
Bremer's De-De-Ba'athjfication Gambit

Gila Svirsky
Anarchy in Our Souls

Uri Avnery
Vanunu and the Terrible Secret


April 24 / 25, 2004

William A. Cook
Tweedledee and Tweedledum: Kerry and Bush Melt into One

Jeffrey St. Clair
Stryking Out: a General, GM and the Army's Latest Tank

Brandy Baker
A Revitalized Women's Movement? Let's Hope So

Robert Fisk
A Warning to Those Who Dare Criticize Israel in the Land of Free Speech

Ben Tripp
October Surmise: a Case of Worst Scenarios

Nelson Valdés
"Submit or Die": Iraq and the American Borg

Lucson Pierre-Charles
Haiti's Return to the Future

Kurt Nimmo
The CIA Killed Pat Tillman

Mark Scaramella
Does Anybody Know Anything?

Patrick Cockburn
The Return of Saddam's Generals

Gary Engler
Welcome to La Paz: a Vacation in Tear Gas

Col. Dan Smith
Whistling in the Dark: Israel, Palestine and Bush

Greg Weiher
Iraq is Utterly Unlike Vietnam...

Elaine Cassel
Life on the Outside: a Review

Vanessa Jones
Letter from Australia: Why an Independent Won Sydney

Jim French
Agriculture's Bullied Market

Hammond Guthrie
Al Aronowitz, Bob Dylan and The Beatles

Poets' Basement
Jones, Holt, Albert, LaMorticella


April 23, 2004

Ron Jacobs
The Only Solution is Immediate Withdrawal

Dave Lindorff
Imagination Deficit Disorder

Mokhiber / Weissman
Contractors and Mercenaries: the Rising Corporate Military Monster

Norman Solomon
Country Joe Band, 2004: "What Are We Fighting For?"

Cynthia McKinney
All Things Are Not Equal: the Perils of Globalization

CounterPunch Wire
A Bitch Called Wanda

Karyn Strickler
Sierra Club, Inc.

Hammond Guthrie
Yellow Caked in the Face

Paul de Rooij
Graveyard of Justifications: Glossary of the Iraqi Occupation

 


April 22, 2004

Patrick Cockburn
When Terror Came to Basra: "I Saw a Minibus of Children on Fire"

Tanya Reinhart
The Wall Behind Disengagement

Lance Selfa
Why is Kucinich Still in the Race?

Josh Frank
Street Fighting Man? Kucinich's Pulled Punches

Sen. Robert Byrd
Bush Owes America Answers on Iraq

William S. Lind
Why We Get It Wrong

Mickey Z.
Undoing the Latches

Robert Jensen
Why They Fast: Remembering the Victims of the World Bank

John L. Hess
The New York Times from 30,000 Feet

 

April 21, 2004

Gary Leupp
Yeats on Iraq

Alfredo Castro
Colombia's Forgotten Prisoners

Dr. Susan Block
Bush's Taliban Drug Deal

William A. Cook
George 1 to George 2

Jack Random
Iraq and Vietnam

Jean-Guy Allard
Alarcon Meets the Editors

Mike Whitney
Charade in the Desert

Bill Christison
Only Major Policies Changes Can Help Washington Now

 


April 20, 2004

Dave Lindorff
Bush and Kerry Share a Problem

Stan Cox
Wal-Mart's Magic Numbers

Bruce Anderson
On Listening to Air America

Joseph Kalvoda
Czech Mate for Condi

Greg Moses
Yesterday's Intelligence

Stan Goff
The Democrats and Iraq

Website of the Day
Santorum Happens

 

 


April 19, 2004

Kurt Nimmo
The "Central Hand" of the Resistance

Mike Whitney
Bob Woodward's Imperial Trifles

Douglas Valentine
52 Pick-Up and the 100-to-1 Rule

John Chuckman
The Sharon Annex: Evil Does Often Triumph

Doug Giebel
Welcome to the Club

Rahul Mahajan
Hospital Closings and War Crimes

 

April 16 / 18, 2004

Robert Fisk
Bush Legitimizes Terror

Saul Landau
Subverting Brazil and Cuba

Dave Lindorff
Paying for War: $2,150 per Family and Counting

Brandy Baker
Fallujah's Collateral Damage

Mickey Z.
The Left Attacks from the Right

Bruce Jackson
The Bush Press Conference: Gott Mit Uns

Norman Solomon
How the "NewsHour" Changed History

Alexander Cockburn
Bush, Kerry and Empire

 

April 15, 2004

Greg Moses
Follow the Families, Not the Script

Virginia Tilley
The Carnage According to Gen. Kimmitt: Just Change the Channel

Ron Jacobs
They Coulda Been Champions of the World: Hurricane Carter and Ron Kovic

Michael Neumann
A Happy Compromise: Hate Crimes Reporting in the Toronto Globe and Mail

 

April 14, 2004

Tom Reeves
Return to Haiti: an American Learning Zone

Reza Fiyouzat
Japan and Iraq

Ron Jacobs
What Bush Really Said

Diane Christian
The Real Passion


 

Hot Stories

Alexander Cockburn
Behold, the Head of a Neo-Con!

Subcomandante Marcos
The Death Train of the WTO

Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens as Model Apostate

Steve Niva
Israel's Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?

Dardagan, Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians

Steve J.B.
Prison Bitch

Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda in the Iraq War

Wendell Berry
Small Destructions Add Up

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

 

Subscribe Online

 

May 5, 2004

Kerry's Campaign

A Lost Cause for Progressives?

By KATHLEEN and BILL CHRISTISON
Former CIA analysts

With pictures of unspeakable behavior by U.S. prison guards and interrogators in Iraq inflaming the world, and the spectacle of a Likud Party vote in Israel making a mockery of ill-thought policy pronouncements on Palestine by a clueless George W. Bush, is there any hope that John Kerry will offer anything but "me too" before the November 2004 U.S. election? The recent experience of a group of New Mexico citizens suggests not.

A small state electorally, able to contribute only five electoral votes to the 270 needed by either major party to win the presidential election, New Mexico is nonetheless one of the swing states that are priority targets of both parties this year, since the election was so close there in 2000. (In that year, Gore received 286,783 votes in the state, to Bush's 286,417 -- a margin of only 366.) Half a dozen New Mexico voters recently banded together, wrote a letter to Kerry, gathered almost 400 signatures of other voters (most but not all New Mexicans), and sent it to him at his Washington, D.C., campaign headquarters via overnight FedEx on April 19, 2004. On April 30, we sent Kerry the entire package again, this time via fax, because by then we had almost 500 signatures. We now have over 500.

The letter clearly shows some signs of having been written by a committee, and some of the drafters would have made it a little stronger, while others would have weakened it a little. Some people refused to sign because they thought the letter too "nice," or because they could not stomach the notion of being "truly inspired" by anything about Kerry, or because they disagreed that any of Kerry's domestic positions were worthy of praise. Some refused to sign because they thought the letter "vitriolic" in its criticism of Israel; others would not sign for the opposite reason -- because they could not agree with the affirmation of a need to guarantee Israel's strength. Some would not sign because they believe that withdrawing from Iraq would constitute "cutting and running," a recipe for disaster, while some thought the letter was not strong enough in condemnation of Kerry's stay-the-course stance on Iraq. Two of the original signatories were so tentative about the effort to change Kerry's positions that they withdrew their signatures, fearing that publicizing the letter and its criticism of Kerry would endanger his election chances. Given the difficulties, we are pleasantly surprised that as many as 500 concerned voters signed on to the letter.

Here is the letter, with a few opening and closing lines of salutation omitted.

* * * * *

"We are writing to you as concerned voters who are disgusted and appalled by President Bush and his policies but also deeply worried that, particularly in the area of foreign policy, your own positions as stated do not seem to point to a course significantly different from Bush's. We approach you not with anger or arrogance; you truly inspire us on a number of issues, particularly on the domestic front. But we are deeply concerned about where Bush is leading the country and fearful that you are not offering clear enough alternatives on issues of surpassing importance to U.S. national security. We believe strongly that Bush's policies are causing new levels of revulsion against the United States throughout the world and consequently have done grave harm to U.S. security.

"Our concern revolves principally around three related issues: 1) Bush's drive to assert U.S. hegemony around the world; 2) Bush's invasion and occupation of Iraq; and 3) Bush's unquestioning support for every policy of the government of Israel, his consequent endorsement of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory, and his failure to engage in any serious effort to forge a just and equitable peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. We would like to hear you speak out on these issues:

"1. The Bush plan for world domination is clearly laid out in the administration's National Security Strategy document issued in September 2002. This official statement of U.S. policy affirms the United States' right to be a colossus, accountable to no one, maintaining a military force greater than the combined military strength of every nation in the world. The document asserts a right to employ military force unilaterally and preemptively wherever in the world the Bush administration chooses. It is filled with fatuous nonsense about the U.S. mission to "rid the world of evil." This kind of policy arrogance arouses deep hatred against the United States throughout the world -- and not simply in the Arab and Muslim world -- and this in turn gravely endangers U.S. security. We are distressed that you have not denounced this Bush policy explicitly, and we strongly urge you to do so. This will not be easy. Major corporate interests in this country -- the military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned of so presciently -- obviously find this policy prescription very attractive, because more U.S. assertiveness around the world means more military contracts, more oil concessions, more business profits. We nonetheless think it imperative that you honestly and forthrightly separate yourself from such exploitative and extremely dangerous interests.

"2. The U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq are part of the Bush drive for global hegemony. The war was morally insupportable, and the occupation is morally, economically, and politically insupportable. Too many Americans are dying needlessly; far too many Iraqis -- uncounted thousands of innocent civilians -- have died and are continuing to die for Bush's empire-building. This is unacceptable. Almost everywhere outside the United States -- and, again, not only in the Arab and Muslim world -- the war is viewed as a sign of an overbearing U.S. arrogance, lawlessness, and utter disregard for the principles of international justice. For quite legitimate reasons, the war and occupation of Iraq have substantially increased hatred of the U.S. throughout the world. We appreciate the fact that you have spoken out against the war, but we are distressed that your opposition seems to have diminished after Howard Dean dropped out of the presidential race and Dennis Kucinich ceased to be a factor in the race. Since that time, you have called for 40,000 more American troops in Iraq -- at a time when many Americans believe the U.S. should get out of Iraq altogether -- and we were disappointed to hear you criticize the new Spanish government's decision to withdraw Spain's troops from Iraq. Along with your vote in October 2002 to authorize the war, these statements give us little reason to hope that your policy toward Iraq as president would be substantially different from Bush's. We urge you, please, to prove us wrong.

"3. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the crucial center of the widespread view in the world that the United States is an unjust, arrogant, domineering power filled with an anti-Arab and anti-Muslim animus and bent on world domination and, through the instrument of Israel, Middle East regional domination. Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, its suppression of the Palestinian people's aspirations for sovereign independence -- as well as the inescapable perception that the United States supports this oppression, pays for and enables the occupation, and cares not at all about justice for the Palestinians -- together constitute a major reason for the revulsion against the U.S. that has led to terrorism against us and our allies. Unquestioning support, such as the Bush administration has given, for everything the rightwing government of Ariel Sharon does in the occupied territories is not the way to fight terrorism, but rather encourages it. Bush's absolute refusal to acknowledge the legitimacy of any Palestinian grievance, to criticize any Israeli policy, to make any serious effort to pursue a genuine peace accord that is fair and just to both sides is not the way to stand up for American values and human rights. We implore you to speak out on this crucial issue. We support a continued strong U.S. effort to buttress Israel's security, and we expect you to remain a strong Israel supporter, but we urge you to abandon what appears to be your reflexive, politically expedient support for Israel's occupation of another people's land. We urge you to be different from Bush on this matter -- to be fair and just and respond to legitimate Palestinian grievances.

"Our distaste for President Bush is no ordinary policy difference. Bush's imperial thrust is no ordinary divergence from past administrations' policies, and therefore this is no ordinary election. The scale and scope of his effort to assert U.S. global dominance and hegemony are so seriously threatening to the United States that it is imperative that he and his neoconservative policymakers be stopped. Only you can do that, by winning the election in November, but our fear is that you have not laid out policy positions that set a significantly different course. The well known scholar and author Chalmers Johnson -- who has written extensively about the dangers of empire, particularly in the landmark book Blowback -- recently wrote that the United States under Bush no longer stands for peace and stability in the face of challenges from revisionist systems such as fascism and communism that have sought a total recasting of the global balance of power, but has instead itself become this very kind of revisionist power, "using our armed missionaries to stuff our version of democracy and free markets down the throats of all other peoples on earth." Johnson does not overstate the case. Bush and his aggressive, lawless pursuit of empire are an international and a U.S. national security disaster.

"It is urgent that you be more than just an echo of Bush's foreign policy positions. Good domestic policies are not enough. We feel there is a danger that the progressive base may not mobilize for your campaign if you cannot more clearly set yourself against Bush."

* * * * *

What do we have in response to this effort by 500 voters -- very few of whom, admittedly, have any possibility of making significant donations to any candidate? Absolutely nothing so far. Neither Kerry nor anyone on his campaign staff has communicated with us in any way as of May 4. (Strangely enough in a swing state -- and contrary to Bush -- Kerry has no paid staff in New Mexico, hence no office that we signatories can storm to force our views on the campaign.) Meanwhile, the guns kill people at a growing rate in Iraq, and the argument that our departure would create chaos grows more hollow each day, when what is causing the chaos in the first place is clearly our own continuing presence. And meanwhile too, neither major party shows even a hint of movement away from total support for Israel's plans to continue occupying major portions of the West Bank, leaving only non-viable Bantustans to the Palestinian people.

Kathleen and Bill Christison are both former CIA political analysts. Kathy has been a freelance writer since resigning from the CIA in 1979, dealing primarily with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Her book Perceptions of Palestine: Their Influence on U.S. Middle East Policy was published in 2001. A second book, The Wound of Dispossession: Telling the Palestinian Story, was published in 2002. Before retiring in 1979, Bill was director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis. He has written extensively in recent years on the problems of U.S. foreign policy. They can be reached at: christison@counterpunch.org



Weekend Edition Features for April 24 / 25, 2004

William A. Cook
Tweedledee and Tweedledum: Kerry and Bush Melt into One

Jeffrey St. Clair
Stryking Out: a General, GM and the Army's Latest Tank

Brandy Baker
A Revitalized Women's Movement? Let's Hope So

Robert Fisk
A Warning to Those Who Dare Criticize Israel in the Land of Free Speech

Ben Tripp
October Surmise: a Case of Worst Scenarios

Nelson Valdés
"Submit or Die": Iraq and the American Borg

Lucson Pierre-Charles
Haiti's Return to the Future

Kurt Nimmo
The CIA Killed Pat Tillman

Mark Scaramella
Does Anybody Know Anything?

Patrick Cockburn
The Return of Saddam's Generals

Gary Engler
Welcome to La Paz: a Vacation in Tear Gas

Col. Dan Smith
Whistling in the Dark: Israel, Palestine and Bush

Greg Weiher
Iraq is Utterly Unlike Vietnam...

Elaine Cassel
Life on the Outside: a Review

Vanessa Jones
Letter from Australia: Why an Independent Won Sydney

Jim French
Agriculture's Bullied Market

Hammond Guthrie
Al Aronowitz, Bob Dylan and The Beatles

Poets' Basement
Jones, Holt, Albert, LaMorticella

Google
WWW http://www.counterpunch.org

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /