Cockburn
/ St. Clair's Scorching New History of a Decade of War
Now Available!

Today's
Stories
May
5, 2004
Gilbert
Achcar
Bush's Cakewalk into the Iraq Quaqmire
May
4, 2004
Human
Rights Watch
A Timeline of Torture and Abuse Allegations
and Responses
Kurt
Nimmo
The CIA Privatized Torture
David
Peterson
CBS, Self-Censorship & Iraq
Barry
Lando
CACI's Private Torture Chambers
Patrick
Cockburn
Torture: Iraqis Disgusted, But Not Surprised
Dr.
Susan Block
Indecent Insurgents: Watch What You Say
Fidel
Castro
A Mindless, Unnecessary War
Mike
Whitney
Empire of Torture
Sonali
Kolhatkar
How to Stop the War: Demonstrate Against
John Kerry
Josh
Frank
The Lost Sierra Club
Stan
Goff
The Role: Another Open Letter to US Troops in Iraq
Agustin
Velloso
Spare Us Your Disgusting Ethics
Stew
Albert
American Know-How
Website
of the Day
Scenes from a Cover-Up

May
3, 2004
Virginia
Tilley
Let the Wall of Silence Fall
May
1 / 2, 2004
Patrick
Cockburn
An Army in Disgrace, a Policy
in Tatters, the Real Prospect of Defeat
Robert
Fisk
"Good Guys" Who Can Do No
Wrong
Alexander
Cockburn
Watching Niagara: Stupid Leaders,
Useless Spies, Angry World
Heather
Williams
Gringo, We're Going Home: Latin
American Troops Flee Iraq
Diane
Rejman
An Army Vet on Torture in Iraq:
Abu Ghraib as My Lai?
Diane
Christian
Blood Spilling: Osama, Bush and
Sharon Speak the Same Language
Patrick
Cockburn
Seems Like Old Times in Fallujah
Dave
Lindorff
Bush's Torturous Logic: Shocked,
Shocked, Shocked
Chris
Floyd
Suicide Bomber: Neocons, Nihilists
and Annihilation

April
29 / 30, 2004
Dave
Zirin
A Pawn in Their Game: the Unlonesome
Death of Pat Tillman
Kathy
Kelly
The Warden's Tour
Greg
Weiher
Fallujah and the Warsaw Ghetto: the
Banality of Evil
Michael
S. Ladah
Terrorism and Assassination: the
Ultimate Depception
Patrick
Cockburn
The Fallujah Mutinies

April
28, 2004
Christopher
Brauchli
Meet Congressman Know-Nothing:
Tom Tancredo
Wendy
Brinker
The Politics of the Numb
Faisal
Kutty
The Dirty Work of Canadian Intelligence
John
Chuckman
Seeking the Evil One
Mike
Whitney
Flag-Draped Coffins and the Seattle Times
Tom
Mountain
Rwanda and the F***** Word
Graeme
Greenback
The Iraqi Alamo: a CNN/CIA Production
Tracy
McLellan
The War Comes Home
M.
Junaid Alam
We are the Barbarians
William
Loren Katz
Iraq, the US and an Old Lesson

April 27, 2004
James
Davis
The Colombia 3 Acquitted
Dave
Lindorff
Chalabi as Prosecutor
Bruce
Schneier
Terrorist Threats and Political
Gain
Cockburn
/ Sengupta
British Generals Resist Calls for
More Troops to Aid Americans in Iraq
Walt
Brasch
Presidential Letters: The Day I
Was Asked to Feed an Elephant
Saul
Landau
The Empire in Denial and the Denial
of Empire
April 26, 2004
Patrick
Cockburn
Crossing the Shia Line: US Troops
Prepare to Enter Najaf
Wayne
Madsen
Trading Places: Will the US Go the Way of the USSR?
Grover
Furr
Protest, Rebellion, Commitment
Elaine
Cassel
Lies About the Patriot Act
Mickey
Z.
Inspired by Pat Tillman?
Greg
Moses
Bremer's De-De-Ba'athjfication Gambit
Gila
Svirsky
Anarchy in Our Souls
Uri
Avnery
Vanunu and the Terrible Secret

April 24 / 25, 2004
William
A. Cook
Tweedledee and Tweedledum: Kerry
and Bush Melt into One
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Stryking Out: a General, GM and the Army's Latest Tank
Brandy
Baker
A Revitalized Women's Movement? Let's Hope So
Robert
Fisk
A Warning to Those Who Dare Criticize Israel in the Land of Free
Speech
Ben
Tripp
October Surmise: a Case of Worst Scenarios
Nelson
Valdés
"Submit or Die": Iraq and the American Borg
Lucson
Pierre-Charles
Haiti's Return to the Future
Kurt
Nimmo
The CIA Killed Pat Tillman
Mark
Scaramella
Does Anybody Know Anything?
Patrick
Cockburn
The Return of Saddam's Generals
Gary
Engler
Welcome to La Paz: a Vacation in Tear Gas
Col.
Dan Smith
Whistling in the Dark: Israel, Palestine and Bush
Greg
Weiher
Iraq is Utterly Unlike Vietnam...
Elaine
Cassel
Life on the Outside: a Review
Vanessa
Jones
Letter from Australia: Why an Independent Won Sydney
Jim
French
Agriculture's Bullied Market
Hammond
Guthrie
Al Aronowitz, Bob Dylan and The Beatles
Poets'
Basement
Jones, Holt, Albert, LaMorticella

April 23, 2004
Ron
Jacobs
The Only Solution is Immediate Withdrawal
Dave
Lindorff
Imagination Deficit Disorder
Mokhiber
/ Weissman
Contractors and Mercenaries: the Rising Corporate Military Monster
Norman
Solomon
Country Joe Band, 2004: "What Are We Fighting For?"
Cynthia
McKinney
All Things Are Not Equal: the Perils of Globalization
CounterPunch
Wire
A Bitch Called Wanda
Karyn
Strickler
Sierra Club, Inc.
Hammond
Guthrie
Yellow Caked in the Face
Paul
de Rooij
Graveyard of Justifications: Glossary
of the Iraqi Occupation
April 22, 2004
Patrick
Cockburn
When Terror Came to Basra: "I
Saw a Minibus of Children on Fire"
Tanya
Reinhart
The Wall Behind Disengagement
Lance
Selfa
Why is Kucinich Still in the Race?
Josh
Frank
Street Fighting Man? Kucinich's Pulled Punches
Sen.
Robert Byrd
Bush Owes America Answers on Iraq
William
S. Lind
Why We Get It Wrong
Mickey
Z.
Undoing the Latches
Robert
Jensen
Why They Fast: Remembering the Victims of the World Bank
John
L. Hess
The New York Times from 30,000 Feet
April
21, 2004
Gary
Leupp
Yeats on Iraq
Alfredo
Castro
Colombia's Forgotten Prisoners
Dr.
Susan Block
Bush's Taliban Drug Deal
William
A. Cook
George 1 to George 2
Jack
Random
Iraq and Vietnam
Jean-Guy
Allard
Alarcon Meets the Editors
Mike
Whitney
Charade in the Desert
Bill
Christison
Only Major Policies Changes Can
Help Washington Now

April 20, 2004
Dave
Lindorff
Bush and Kerry Share a Problem
Stan
Cox
Wal-Mart's Magic Numbers
Bruce
Anderson
On Listening to Air America
Joseph
Kalvoda
Czech Mate for Condi
Greg
Moses
Yesterday's Intelligence
Stan
Goff
The Democrats and Iraq
Website
of the Day
Santorum Happens
April 19, 2004
Kurt
Nimmo
The "Central Hand" of the
Resistance
Mike
Whitney
Bob Woodward's Imperial Trifles
Douglas
Valentine
52 Pick-Up and the 100-to-1
Rule
John
Chuckman
The Sharon Annex: Evil Does Often
Triumph
Doug
Giebel
Welcome to the Club
Rahul
Mahajan
Hospital Closings and War Crimes

April
16 / 18, 2004
Robert
Fisk
Bush Legitimizes Terror
Saul
Landau
Subverting Brazil and Cuba
Dave
Lindorff
Paying for War: $2,150 per Family
and Counting
Brandy
Baker
Fallujah's Collateral Damage
Mickey
Z.
The Left Attacks from the Right
Bruce
Jackson
The Bush Press Conference: Gott Mit
Uns
Norman
Solomon
How the "NewsHour" Changed
History
Alexander
Cockburn
Bush, Kerry and Empire

April
15, 2004
Greg
Moses
Follow the Families, Not the Script
Virginia
Tilley
The Carnage According to Gen. Kimmitt:
Just Change the Channel
Ron
Jacobs
They Coulda Been Champions of the
World: Hurricane Carter and Ron Kovic
Michael
Neumann
A Happy Compromise: Hate Crimes
Reporting in the Toronto Globe and Mail

April
14, 2004
Tom
Reeves
Return to Haiti: an American Learning
Zone
Reza
Fiyouzat
Japan and Iraq
Ron
Jacobs
What Bush Really Said
Diane
Christian
The Real Passion

Hot Stories
Alexander Cockburn
Behold,
the Head of a Neo-Con!
Subcomandante
Marcos
The
Death Train of the WTO
Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens
as Model Apostate
Steve Niva
Israel's
Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?
Dardagan,
Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians
Steve
J.B.
Prison Bitch
Sheldon
Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda
in the Iraq War
Wendell
Berry
Small Destructions Add Up
CounterPunch
Wire
WMD: Who Said What When
Cindy
Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter
I Can't Hear From
Gore Vidal
The
Erosion of the American Dream
Francis Boyle
Impeach
Bush: A Draft Resolution
Click
Here for More Stories.

|
May
5, 2004
Kerry's Campaign
A Lost Cause
for Progressives?
By KATHLEEN and BILL CHRISTISON
Former CIA
analysts
With pictures of unspeakable behavior
by U.S. prison guards and interrogators in Iraq inflaming the
world, and the spectacle of a Likud Party vote in Israel making
a mockery of ill-thought policy pronouncements on Palestine by
a clueless George W. Bush, is there any hope that John Kerry
will offer anything but "me too" before the November
2004 U.S. election? The recent experience of a group of New
Mexico citizens suggests not.
A small state electorally,
able to contribute only five electoral votes to the 270 needed
by either major party to win the presidential election, New Mexico
is nonetheless one of the swing states that are priority targets
of both parties this year, since the election was so close there
in 2000. (In that year, Gore received 286,783 votes in the state,
to Bush's 286,417 -- a margin of only 366.) Half a dozen New
Mexico voters recently banded together, wrote a letter to Kerry,
gathered almost 400 signatures of other voters (most but not
all New Mexicans), and sent it to him at his Washington, D.C.,
campaign headquarters via overnight FedEx on April 19, 2004.
On April 30, we sent Kerry the entire package again, this time
via fax, because by then we had almost 500 signatures. We now
have over 500.
The letter clearly shows some
signs of having been written by a committee, and some of the
drafters would have made it a little stronger, while others would
have weakened it a little. Some people refused to sign because
they thought the letter too "nice," or because they
could not stomach the notion of being "truly inspired"
by anything about Kerry, or because they disagreed that any of
Kerry's domestic positions were worthy of praise. Some refused
to sign because they thought the letter "vitriolic"
in its criticism of Israel; others would not sign for the opposite
reason -- because they could not agree with the affirmation of
a need to guarantee Israel's strength. Some would not sign because
they believe that withdrawing from Iraq would constitute "cutting
and running," a recipe for disaster, while some thought
the letter was not strong enough in condemnation of Kerry's stay-the-course
stance on Iraq. Two of the original signatories were so tentative
about the effort to change Kerry's positions that they withdrew
their signatures, fearing that publicizing the letter and its
criticism of Kerry would endanger his election chances. Given
the difficulties, we are pleasantly surprised that as many as
500 concerned voters signed on to the letter.
Here is the letter, with a
few opening and closing lines of salutation omitted.
* *
* * *
"We are writing to you
as concerned voters who are disgusted and appalled by President
Bush and his policies but also deeply worried that, particularly
in the area of foreign policy, your own positions as stated do
not seem to point to a course significantly different from Bush's.
We approach you not with anger or arrogance; you truly inspire
us on a number of issues, particularly on the domestic front.
But we are deeply concerned about where Bush is leading the
country and fearful that you are not offering clear enough alternatives
on issues of surpassing importance to U.S. national security.
We believe strongly that Bush's policies are causing new levels
of revulsion against the United States throughout the world and
consequently have done grave harm to U.S. security.
"Our concern revolves
principally around three related issues: 1) Bush's drive to assert
U.S. hegemony around the world; 2) Bush's invasion and occupation
of Iraq; and 3) Bush's unquestioning support for every policy
of the government of Israel, his consequent endorsement of Israel's
occupation of Palestinian territory, and his failure to engage
in any serious effort to forge a just and equitable peace agreement
between Israel and the Palestinians. We would like to hear you
speak out on these issues:
"1. The Bush plan for
world domination is clearly laid out in the administration's
National Security Strategy document issued in September 2002.
This official statement of U.S. policy affirms the United States'
right to be a colossus, accountable to no one, maintaining a
military force greater than the combined military strength
of every nation in the world. The document asserts a right to
employ military force unilaterally and preemptively wherever
in the world the Bush administration chooses. It is filled with
fatuous nonsense about the U.S. mission to "rid the world
of evil." This kind of policy arrogance arouses deep hatred
against the United States throughout the world -- and not simply
in the Arab and Muslim world -- and this in turn gravely endangers
U.S. security. We are distressed that you have not denounced
this Bush policy explicitly, and we strongly urge you to do so.
This will not be easy. Major corporate interests in this country
-- the military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower
warned of so presciently -- obviously find this policy prescription
very attractive, because more U.S. assertiveness around the world
means more military contracts, more oil concessions, more business
profits. We nonetheless think it imperative that you honestly
and forthrightly separate yourself from such exploitative and
extremely dangerous interests.
"2. The U.S. invasion
and occupation of Iraq are part of the Bush drive for global
hegemony. The war was morally insupportable, and the occupation
is morally, economically, and politically insupportable. Too
many Americans are dying needlessly; far too many Iraqis -- uncounted
thousands of innocent civilians -- have died and are continuing
to die for Bush's empire-building. This is unacceptable. Almost
everywhere outside the United States -- and, again, not only
in the Arab and Muslim world -- the war is viewed as a sign of
an overbearing U.S. arrogance, lawlessness, and utter disregard
for the principles of international justice. For quite legitimate
reasons, the war and occupation of Iraq have substantially increased
hatred of the U.S. throughout the world. We appreciate the fact
that you have spoken out against the war, but we are distressed
that your opposition seems to have diminished after Howard Dean
dropped out of the presidential race and Dennis Kucinich ceased
to be a factor in the race. Since that time, you have called
for 40,000 more American troops in Iraq -- at a time when
many Americans believe the U.S. should get out of Iraq altogether
-- and we were disappointed to hear you criticize the new Spanish
government's decision to withdraw Spain's troops from Iraq.
Along with your vote in October 2002 to authorize the war, these
statements give us little reason to hope that your policy toward
Iraq as president would be substantially different from Bush's.
We urge you, please, to prove us wrong.
"3. The Israeli-Palestinian
conflict is the crucial center of the widespread view in the
world that the United States is an unjust, arrogant, domineering
power filled with an anti-Arab and anti-Muslim animus and bent
on world domination and, through the instrument of Israel, Middle
East regional domination. Israel's occupation of the West Bank
and Gaza, its suppression of the Palestinian people's aspirations
for sovereign independence -- as well as the inescapable perception
that the United States supports this oppression, pays for and
enables the occupation, and cares not at all about justice for
the Palestinians -- together constitute a major reason for the
revulsion against the U.S. that has led to terrorism against
us and our allies. Unquestioning support, such as the Bush administration
has given, for everything the rightwing government of Ariel Sharon
does in the occupied territories is not the way to fight
terrorism, but rather encourages it. Bush's absolute refusal
to acknowledge the legitimacy of any Palestinian grievance, to
criticize any Israeli policy, to make any serious effort to pursue
a genuine peace accord that is fair and just to both sides is
not the way to stand up for American values and human
rights. We implore you to speak out on this crucial issue.
We support a continued strong U.S. effort to buttress Israel's
security, and we expect you to remain a strong Israel supporter,
but we urge you to abandon what appears to be your reflexive,
politically expedient support for Israel's occupation of another
people's land. We urge you to be different from Bush on this
matter -- to be fair and just and respond to legitimate Palestinian
grievances.
"Our distaste for President
Bush is no ordinary policy difference. Bush's imperial thrust
is no ordinary divergence from past administrations' policies,
and therefore this is no ordinary election. The scale and scope
of his effort to assert U.S. global dominance and hegemony are
so seriously threatening to the United States that it is imperative
that he and his neoconservative policymakers be stopped. Only
you can do that, by winning the election in November, but our
fear is that you have not laid out policy positions that set
a significantly different course. The well known scholar and
author Chalmers Johnson -- who has written extensively about
the dangers of empire, particularly in the landmark book Blowback
-- recently wrote that the United States under Bush no longer
stands for peace and stability in the face of challenges from
revisionist systems such as fascism and communism that have sought
a total recasting of the global balance of power, but has instead
itself become this very kind of revisionist power, "using
our armed missionaries to stuff our version of democracy and
free markets down the throats of all other peoples on earth."
Johnson does not overstate the case. Bush and his aggressive,
lawless pursuit of empire are an international and a U.S. national
security disaster.
"It is urgent that you
be more than just an echo of Bush's foreign policy positions.
Good domestic policies are not enough. We feel there is
a danger that the progressive base may not mobilize for your
campaign if you cannot more clearly set yourself against Bush."
* *
* * *
What do we have in response
to this effort by 500 voters -- very few of whom, admittedly,
have any possibility of making significant donations to any candidate?
Absolutely nothing so far. Neither Kerry nor anyone on his
campaign staff has communicated with us in any way as of May
4. (Strangely enough in a swing state -- and contrary to Bush
-- Kerry has no paid staff in New Mexico, hence no office that
we signatories can storm to force our views on the campaign.)
Meanwhile, the guns kill people at a growing rate in Iraq, and
the argument that our departure would create chaos grows more
hollow each day, when what is causing the chaos in the first
place is clearly our own continuing presence. And meanwhile too,
neither major party shows even a hint of movement away from total
support for Israel's plans to continue occupying major portions
of the West Bank, leaving only non-viable Bantustans to the Palestinian
people.
Kathleen and Bill Christison are both former CIA political analysts.
Kathy has been a freelance writer since resigning from the CIA
in 1979, dealing primarily with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
Her book Perceptions of Palestine: Their Influence on U.S.
Middle East Policy was published in 2001. A second book,
The Wound of Dispossession: Telling the Palestinian Story,
was published in 2002. Before retiring in 1979, Bill was director
of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis. He has
written extensively in recent years on the problems of U.S. foreign
policy. They can be reached at: christison@counterpunch.org
Weekend Edition
Features for April 24 / 25, 2004
William
A. Cook
Tweedledee and Tweedledum: Kerry
and Bush Melt into One
Jeffrey
St. Clair
Stryking Out: a General, GM and the Army's Latest Tank
Brandy
Baker
A Revitalized Women's Movement? Let's Hope So
Robert
Fisk
A Warning to Those Who Dare Criticize Israel in the Land of Free
Speech
Ben
Tripp
October Surmise: a Case of Worst Scenarios
Nelson
Valdés
"Submit or Die": Iraq and the American Borg
Lucson
Pierre-Charles
Haiti's Return to the Future
Kurt
Nimmo
The CIA Killed Pat Tillman
Mark
Scaramella
Does Anybody Know Anything?
Patrick
Cockburn
The Return of Saddam's Generals
Gary
Engler
Welcome to La Paz: a Vacation in Tear Gas
Col.
Dan Smith
Whistling in the Dark: Israel, Palestine and Bush
Greg
Weiher
Iraq is Utterly Unlike Vietnam...
Elaine
Cassel
Life on the Outside: a Review
Vanessa
Jones
Letter from Australia: Why an Independent Won Sydney
Jim
French
Agriculture's Bullied Market
Hammond
Guthrie
Al Aronowitz, Bob Dylan and The Beatles
Poets'
Basement
Jones, Holt, Albert, LaMorticella
|