Annual Fundraising Appeal

Here’s an important message to CounterPunch readers from Chris Hedges….

Hedges2

Chris Hedges calls CounterPunch “the most fearless, intellectually rigorous and important publication in the United States.” Who are we to argue? But the only way we can continue to “dissect the evils of empire” and the “psychosis of permanent war” is with your financial support. Please donate.

Day8

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

paypal-donate-21

Don’t want to donate through PayPal?
Then click here to donate through our secure server.

 To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Does Anyone Doubt Bush Was AWOL?

Pink Slips at CBS

by MIKE WHITNEY

The only thing surprising about the purge at CBS was that they handed out the pink slips with a straight face. Other than that the episode was sadly reminiscent of Porter Goss wielding his scimitar over at the CIA. A few quick swishing motions and the erring parties were removed. Dan Rather, of course, was spared the humiliation of getting the boot down the office stairwell and, instead, was asked to commit ritual seppuku in the privacy of his own Park Ave. penthouse. The others simply got a brisk walk to the front door.

The whole incident yielded the unpleasant odor of corporate despotism; four careers sacrificed to the god of political loyalty. But, then, that seems to be the way of things now. One’s future is strangely tied to one’s deference to the "Dear Leader" just as it is at state-run TV. Slip up on story about Bush’s faithful service in the National Guard and it’s a quick jaunt to the unemployment line. What a joke.

Is there any doubt that the deserter-in-chief was AWOL during the time he was supposed to be with his Alabama unit? Remember, it was a small unit and, yet, not one of the men recalls the young G.W. ever showing up.

We also know that Bush didn’t ease his way into the "champagne unit" by virtue of his prodigious intellectual abilities. He was shoe-horned into the Guard by family patronage, and he skedaddled when he,d had enough. So, why all this hoopla about "forged" signatures anyway? It’s completely irrelevant. CBS nailed the bigger story even if they slipped up on a few trivial details. Big deal.

True, this is all yesterday’s news, but even the corn-fed, gun-totin,, confederate flag-waving yahoos don’t believe that Bush served his time anymore. The last true believers seem to be the boardroom bigwigs at CBS, who see it as a device for evacuating the last fetid remnants of liberal journalism.

Okay, I can live with that, but when does "political cleansing" become the theatre of the absurd?

 

The Investigation

First they dredge up Louis Boccardi, retired chief executive officer of The Associated Press, (Yes, the same Associated Press that processed all the sketchy exit polling after the 2004 election) Boccardi also belongs to the prestigious CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) the ultimate insiders club that steers the ship of state towards such worthwhile projects as deposing the democratically elected leader of Haiti and hard-charging for the Iraq war.

Boccardi was joined in the investigation by former Attorney General Dick Thornburgh. Thornburgh is a charter member of the far-right Federalist Society and a died-in-the-wool Bush loyalist. (The Federalist Society has a number of alumnae in the Bush administration. They,ve provided much of the legal rationale for the unlawful detention of aliens, the enhanced powers of the Executive, the indefinite incarceration of POW’s and the cruel and unusual treatment of prisoners.) Heading up an investigation with Thornburgh is like polling Madame DeFarge on the merits of the death penalty. It’s a slam-dunk. The Boccardi-Thornburgh combination was nothing more than a nattily clad firing squad. They were hired to dispatch the CBS infidels and to send a message that future impertinence would not be tolerated. Employees are quick to apprehend the meaning of such directives; especially when their job’s on the line.

The duo delivered their 224-page tome on the "shameful lack of journalistic standards" to the media and the station’s corporate chieftains. "The system broke down on this one, for sure," Boccardi moaned.

Their tedious performance was picked up and repeated on every major TV station; muttering the same stale bromides over and over again. Boccardi would whimper about the "myopic zeal" in rushing the story on air, and Thornburgh would follow up with some energetic finger-wagging at the "errors of credulity and over-enthusiasm." The sanctimoniousness of their recital almost obscured the fact that the real force behind the investigation was a White House vendetta directed at critics of the Peerless Leader.

Where were these pompous politicos when Judith Miller was pulling stories out of the ether about phantom WMDs in Iraq? No one was too concerned about "journalistic standards" back then.

And what about the penetrating news coverage of the 2 month siege of Falluja? Think that might have been worth investigating?

Or, what about the media blackout of election irregularities in Ohio? Are exit poll discrepancies only a curiosity when they happen in Ukraine?

There are literally hundreds of stories the media either buries or mishandles every year. The only reason this one grew legs was because it zeroed in on our pretzel-choking, Mt biking, war-president, George Bush.

Don’t get me wrong. I wouldn’t care if they wrapped Dan Rather in an American flag and ran him through the streets of Sadr City, but all this braying about "journalistic standards"?

Please! The TV executives yanked those off life-support a long time ago.

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He can be reached at: fergiewhitney@msn.com